Not to mention, in real life many of them have a high degree of pilot assist - I can just imagine that's all turned on. The bit-too-easy flight models on a lot of the helicopters are simply more believable to me on the larger ones, which often should feel a bit more sluggish. It is quite well done, has a high level of systems replication, albeit the flight model isn't as advanced as the Dodosim is (but then, nothing else in FSX is).Nemeth helicopters are quite nice to look at - as Alan mentioned, the flight models aren't quite as good, but they are generally okay to fly with if you're not too picky.I own helicopters from all of the developers but my general rule is that I'm more picky on the smaller helicopters than the large ones. Aerosoft does a that's controversial - some people like it almost as much as the Dodo, some don't like it at all.Finally, if you go over to (great helosim community website), there's a freeware program called, which uses to replace the flight models of many FSX helos with higher-fidelity alternatives. That means you can adjust the realism as you come up the learning curve.Also worth a look are the helos. What's especially nice is that the realism scales - there are five realism settings, with the lowest close to default, and the highest representing full realism (and difficulty). The flight model is extraordinary - it was programmed entirely outside of FSX, so it overcomes all of the FSX helo limitations. It's old and looks it, especially in the VC, though I find I spend most of my time looking through the bubble at the outside world and don't mind the VC too much. By far the best third-party helo for FSX is the. I don't know the Nemeth EC-135, but in general, you can do better than Nemeth - their flight models tend to be odd and they're not great about fixing problems (though the visuals are great, especially with their Milviz-designed helos).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |